On the 25th of October, the new Minister of Finance will present the Medium Term Budget Framework (MTBF). Ratings agencies will closely watch this and if the Minister does not satisfy these agencies, the country will probably be downgraded to full junk status.
Our local currency debt was downgraded following the removal of Pravin Gordhan and his deputy from Treasury. Gordhan was respected by the rating agencies and he had convinced business leaders to help him lobby these agencies and other offshore financial institutions. This had gone a long way in keeping the country from being downgraded.
The general consensus seems to be that the new Minister of Finance, Malusi Gigaba, has yet to gain the confidence of business and consequently of ratings agencies.
The problem we face
One of then Finance Minister Gordhan’s key strengths was that he expressed total opposition to corruption and “state capture”. Business leaders have indicated that they are yet to be convinced that Minister Gigaba is as firm on corruption.
In addition, State Owned Companies (SOCs) have sunk further into debt and some like SAA need to be recapitalised (up to R10 billion will be required). Unless strong governance is introduced into these entities, they will continue to be a drag on South Africa’s finances (Government guarantees SOCs’ debt).
Tax revenue has also dropped and potentially will fall R50 billion short of the target set in the February Budget speech.
How will Minister Gigaba fill a R60 billion hole?
Realistically, there are only two options:
- Increased tax revenue which can come either from rising economic growth or from increasing taxes. It is well known that economic growth is too low to raise tax revenue – we are just coming out of a recession.
Increasing taxes is equally difficult. At 45% marginal tax rates, pushing the rate up will almost certainly be counter-productive. Then Finance Minister Gordhan said in February that tax morality and compliance were declining, making it more difficult to raise taxes.
Treasury has looked to introduce new taxes such as a wealth tax and taxing individuals who work in tax havens. Neither of these is expected to bring in significant revenue.
Every 1% rise in the VAT rate adds R15 billion to state revenue. Thus, it could raise significant revenue, but this will be seen as a tax on the poor and with elections just over eighteen months away, seems highly unlikely.
- Cut government expenditure. Salaries already account for half of expenditure but as with increasing VAT, reducing staff is politically sensitive. The easy cuts in government spend have already been made – travel, conferences etc.
One line Minister Gigaba is pursuing is selling government assets to recapitalise SAA. Another is using the Public Investment Corporation (PIC) which has assets of R1.8 trillion.
Tapping the PIC or selling assets will do the job of covering the R60 billion hole but unless there is serious intent to rein in SOCs, these remedies will have little credibility as we will face the same situation next year.
The day of reckoning
The MTBF looks at government revenue and expenditure over the next three years. This is a comprehensive document of government strategies and assumptions. It sets out in detail where revenue and expenditure will be raised and spent. In effect, the Minister will have to demonstrate to the ratings agencies that South Africa is still committed to a prudent fiscal policy. If the MTBF is not considered credible, we can almost certainly expect swift downgrades to junk status which will leave us all poorer.
This article is a general information sheet and should not be used or relied upon as professional advice. No liability can be accepted for any errors or omissions nor for any loss or damage arising from reliance upon any information herein. Always contact your financial adviser for specific and detailed advice. Errors and omissions excepted (E&OE)